Today, many Christians possess modern translations, not realizing they are based on untrustworthy Greek and Hebrew texts. These old and new
testament texts
were created by Hort and Westcott, who made the false claim that since
their texts were based on the earliest and best manuscripts, around 4th
century AD, and being earliest, they must automatically be more
accurate. However, between the beginning of the 2nd and 5th century AD, more and more false teachings came out of the Church at Rome, and out of Alexandrian churches with their Arian and Gnostic beliefs. Given the amount of false teachings, it was necessary for bible texts that supported these false doctrines to be created to reduce adverse discovery by believers. The result was primarily the Sinaiticus, Vaticanus and Alexandrian type texts supposedly during this 2nd to 5th century AD period. The propagation of false doctrines to modern translations worked this way:
Our in-depth studies have found over 3200 verses with doctrinal changes, primarily through the removal of words, phrases, sentences and even sections of scripture. And virtually all modern translations based on Hort and Westcott have the very same doctrinal changes. This table illustrates this: http://www.millpark.org/bible/doctrine-critical/Hort_and_Westcott_and_RT_versions.html . Here is a reference to many of the corrupted verses: http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/manuscript_evidence.html . If you look those verses up in their context, the wise believer can discover what false doctrines have arisen. |
1. ACCOMODATE UNIQUELY
CATHOLIC, ARIAN AND GNOSTIC DOCTRINES IN ABOUT 42% OF THE VERSES (~3200 VERSES) WHICH IS ASTOUNDING !!!! 2. HAVE ABOUT 31% OF NT VERSES ARE BACK-TRANSLATED INTO GREEK FROM THE LATIN TEXTS OF 4TH CENTURY ROME 3. THE "EARLIEST AND BEST" MANUSCRIPT CLAIM IS ACTUALLY THE "EARLIEST AND BEST UNIQUELY CATHOLIC / ARIAN / GNOSTIC" MANUSCRIPT, WHICH RAISES ISSUES |
1. AS PROVEN BY STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PROBABILITY THEORY! 2. HAVE CHANGES MOTIVATED BY RELIGIOUS VIEWPOINT ACCOMMODATION, PARTICULARLY CHURCH AT ROME, AND ALEXANDRIAN CHURCHES, IN FIRST 5 CENTURIES 3. SINAITICUS IS A FORGERY AND VATICANUS IS NOT FROM 450 BUT 949 AD, AND BOTH HAVE TEXTS THAT WERE OVERWRITTEN WITH ALTERNATE GREEK WORDS TO ACCOMMODATE UNIQUELY CATHOLIC DOCTRINES 4. ALEXANDRIAN AUTHORS ALSO EMENDED ARIAN AND GNOSTIC DOCTRINAL ACCOMMODATIONS INTO THE GREEK TEXTS 5. OF ALL THE VARIANTS, ONLY 7% ARE IN NON-DOCTRINAL VERSES , BUT 60% ARE IN OF DOCTRINAL VERSES, PROVING CHANGES WERE MOSTLY DELIBERATE !!!!!!!!!!!! |
1. RECENT TRANSLATORS OF THE GREEK NT, IN THE AUTHORS' OWN WORDS, SHOW THEY ARE DUBIOUS AT BEST, APOSTATE AT WORST 2. MANY RELIGIOUS ACCOMODATIONS AND BIASES DEGRADE THE MODERN TRANSLATIONS 3. MUCH OF THE GREEK IS NOT EVEN TRANSLATED (ABOUT 1% OF VERSES, ABOUT 80) 4. SINAITICUS IS AN ADMITTED FORGERY AND VATICANUS IS A WIDELY OVERWRITTEN TEXT AND SO IS ALSO A FORGERY, SO BOTH ARE NOT THE "OLDEST AND BEST MSS" |
The
Table of Contents that follows outlines a study that will
show,
with significant forensic evidence, which line of scripture can be trusted
today, and why. This is a broad study, perhaps a 1-2 hour read for
some, so it is broken down into sections, as follows, to allow for
breaks. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS (links)
Your comments are welcome at info@hometownmail.net |